A sixth-grade student stared at her science test, unable to answer most questions. Resigned, she wrote at the top: “I felled bedly.” The misspelling revealed a heartbreaking truth—she couldn’t read well enough to spell “failed badly,” let alone comprehend the science content.
This example from Laurie Lee, a senior research associate at the Florida Center for Reading Research, illustrates a crisis hiding in plain sight. While states have invested millions in overhauling reading instruction for kindergarten through third grade, older students in grades 4-8 continue to fall through the cracks as content becomes more complex.
The statistics are sobering. According to the 2024 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP only 30 percent of eighth graders read at proficient level—unchanged since 1992. The EdWeek Research Center data shows 58 percent of educators report at least a quarter of their middle and high school students struggle with basic reading skills.
Those are sobering statistics. States are trying to move the needle. Roughly 40 states have passed science of reading laws to bring better teacher training and high quality instructional materials focused on grades K-3 or K-5. While that’s laudable, it leaves older struggling readers without systematic support. As Anna Shapiro of the RAND Corporation noted, “There’s this focus on K-3 without a lot of resources dedicated to helping the kids in secondary school that fell through the cracks.”
By middle school, reading difficulties cascade across subjects. Students who can’t decode words like “photosynthesis” or “polynomial” struggle in science, math, and social studies—not because of content, but because they can’t read. The adage that in grades K-3 “students learn to read” and from fourth grade on they “read to learn” sounds prophetic, but that’s not what the data is telling us is actually happening for a very large percentage of secondary students.
The problem deepens: 38 percent of educators working with secondary students have received zero training on helping older struggling readers, according to EdWeek Research Center. Another 38 percent taught themselves. Only a fifth received preparation during teacher training programs.
More than a quarter of middle school English teachers now frequently teach foundational skills like phonics—skills they were never trained to teach. They’re stopping lessons at least three times weekly to address basic reading gaps.
Rebecca Kockler of the Advanced Education Research and Development Fund explains the challenge: “It’s that application into complex words that we basically didn’t teach kids anywhere in our system, in the same explicit way we do with younger kids.”
Kevin Smith, co-founder of the Adolescent Literacy Alliance, emphasizes the urgency: “We can’t intervene our way out of instruction. There’s not enough time in the world to get caught up if they’re not getting help throughout the day.”
Kevin Smith, co –founder of the Adolescent Literacy Alliance
EdWeek Research Center data reveals only half of educators working with middle and high school students report their districts provide extra intervention time and staff. At the high school level, only a third have dedicated intervention time or screening assessments—a stark contrast to elementary schools where resources are concentrated.
Most critically, age-appropriate instructional materials designed for older struggling readers are virtually nonexistent. Teachers must adapt materials meant for young children—a demoralizing experience for adolescents already embarrassed about their reading difficulties.
Kockler witnessed this gap in Louisiana, where dramatic fourth-grade improvements disappeared by eighth grade. “What was frustrating for me is I could not touch my middle school reading results,” she noted.
Students who can’t access grade-level texts fall further behind each year, struggling with homework and assessments while disengagement grows. Many have been passed along from grade to grade, their reading difficulties unaddressed until academic demands become insurmountable.
Despite these challenges, there’s reason for hope. As Kockler notes, “Mississippi and Louisiana are incredible examples of when you have good research and tools to deploy, you can see real results.”
The next critical step is developing tools specifically designed for older children’s literacy needs—materials that respect their age and interests while providing systematic instruction.
Until now, educators have had to adapt materials designed for much younger learners. The absence of age-appropriate instructional materials has been one of the most significant barriers to helping older struggling readers.
Tumbleweed Publishing addresses this gap with decodable readers built specifically for neurodiverse and striving readers in grades 2-8. These materials respect students’ age and interests while providing systematic, structured literacy instruction. Unlike primary-grade materials, Tumbleweed’s readers engage older students with developmentally appropriate content.
The comprehensive teacher guides empower any adult—reading specialists, content-area teachers, or paraprofessionals—to deliver quality lessons. Recognizing that many educators lack training in foundational literacy instruction, these guides provide clear, step-by-step support that benefits every student.
For the first time, educators have research-based materials designed specifically for the students who have been left behind—a critical step toward ensuring every student receives the reading instruction they need to succeed.
Coffey, Lauren. “Schools Overhauled Reading Programs. Older Students Are Being Left Behind.” EdSurge News, January 23, 2026.
https://www.edsurge.com/news/2026-01-23-schools-overhauled-reading-programs-older-students-are-being-left-behind
Sawchuk, Stephen. “Secondary Students Are Struggling With Reading, Too. A Look at the Landscape.”
Education Week, November 24, 2025.
https://www.edweek.org/teaching-learning/secondary-students-are-struggling-with-reading-too-a-look-at-the-landscape/2025/11